This week I will touch on several family patterns and
theories. The first theory is called, Family Systems Theory, this theory is
found in the family is described like a circle. A cause creates either a positive
or negative feedback loop. A good example of this is a sibling bickering. One, let’s
say hits his little sister. She in turn hits him back and maybe kicks him. He
gets upset and starts crying. This is a good example of this theory working,
because each action builds and creates another negative loop. To make these
loops a bit more intricate, can be solid and easily seen, others transparent.
Each way to describe these is like fences around a house, the first being super
closed and obvious a cinder block fenced home with barbed wire. Everyone can see
it but it’s not transparent These often manifest in a possible passive aggressive
stance. Another is a house completely open, no home, open to everyone, the door
is unlocked, and many people cross their yard. This could be as obvious as a
fight. The final instance is like a house with a white picket fence. Open
enough for observation but obvious enough to be left alone. This I often find in
disciplinary action, obvious to everyone, however nobody wants or can be
involved. Within these examples with the loops to build on it more are sibling
or family subsystems. These are like unspoken rules or assumptions built or established
within each family. A good example of this was thanksgiving in my family. It
was interesting to reflect on this experience, because the situation fit so
perfectly in this mold. This was an argument. Families tend to revert to family
roles when everyone is gathered, even in adulthood everyone returns to their
original roles. So, when my twin eldest brothers got upset with my older
brother, but younger than them, they worked together in the argument against
the other brother. The argument escalated into a yelling match. This I would
say is a good example of the white picket fence, everyone could see, yet there
were only three participates. What makes this interesting is that the behavior for
the twins to bind together and gang up on another opponent came from the family
long before we moved out. Since they grew up working together, they naturally reverted
to this, then conflict with the next youngest brother was either constant or frequent
enough for them to revert to this state at Thanksgiving dinner. Another good
example is how everyone reacted. I simply observed and stayed out of it, my
parents looked on, because sibling fights were not super uncommon in our
household. My sister was likewise ignored. Another good example of a subsystem
I observed that same day obvious in one of my sisters-in-law married to one of
the twins. She wanted to leave. It can be safe to assume she would do the same
when fights broke out in her household. This reaction is also very normal, as
it triggered her flight reaction. When we encounter picket fence scenarios that
are negative, we often react in one of three ways, fight, flight, or freeze. My
sister, and I both froze. The brothers fought, and the sister-in-law took to
fleeing. I think when you reflect on your role in the family it will surprise you
as to how you react in certain situations is constant. There are also patterns
on how you react that can be traced back to family life. What can we do about
these behaviors? Well the first is to identify the behavior or role you are
playing. If this is negative, I would prompt you to either change that behavior
to a more positive one or altogether just stop. This will keep the same
situation from triggering in the future. If a positive response is desired it
will take the work of yourself to try to make that happen. This can take the
form of a family discussion or even an evaluation of yourself on how you can
change. If done well it will surprise your family members, due to your change
they will react differently and your families roles will change in accordance to
that change.
No comments:
Post a Comment